Regenerative Medicine: A New Perspective on a Controversial Topic
By medpagetoday.com
The year was 2001, but it seems like only yesterday that President George W. Bush's restriction on funding for new embryonic stem cell research made the front pages of every national newspaper, giving rise to significant ethical debates - and driving some U.S. scientists to set up laboratories in other countries.
Fast forward to last fall when a former colleague, Robin L. Smith, MD, MBA, forwarded me a copy of the proceedings from "The Progress of Regenerative Medicine and Its Cultural Impact", an international conference that was co-sponsored by the Pontifical Council for Culture and held in Vatican City.
The surprising confluence of science and religion was refreshing; it prompted me to dive a little deeper into what has transpired in the field of stem cell research over the past 15 years.
Although research on embryonic stem cell lines continues, the field has become much less dependent on them since 2006, when Shinya Yamanaka (a Japanese researcher who later won a Nobel Prize) devised a method for turning adult cells back into stem cells (i.e., cells with the ability to become differentiated cell types.)
Extraordinary progress in the field of stem cell research has laid the foundation for a broad range of cell-based therapies that arrest degeneration or restore functionality for patients with diseases that cannot be cured by traditional medicines; today, at least 4,500 clinical trials are underway in the U.S. using adult stem cells to directly treat patients with heart disease, blindness, Parkinson's disease, HIV, diabetes, blood cancers, spinal cord injuries, and other conditions.
Beyond direct therapies, researchers are creating stem cells from adult cells of patients with challenging chronic conditions (e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) to study diseases in Petri dishes; and Australian scientists have developed a new technique for reprogramming bone and fat cells as stem cells – a breakthrough with enormous potential for treating back pain, spinal disc injury, and joint degeneration.
All of this has led to the emergence of regenerative medicine, a branch of medical science that works to restore the structure and function of damaged tissues and organs, and to create solutions for organs that become permanently damaged.
What does all this portend for population health – and, importantly, how might these advances impact the culture of medicine and change everyday clinical practice?
For insight into these questions, I turned to Smith, a global thought leader, medical expert in cell therapy research, president of the Stem for Life Foundation, and respected author and Huffington Post columnist.
On the population health front, she anticipates that continued advances in the science, safety, and ethics of adult stem cell use to defend against disease and reduce the effects of degeneration will result in people living longer, more productive lives.
As the health system continues its shift toward spending on value rather than volume, she expects that nontraditional medical and technological constructs (e.g., personalized medicine, immunotherapy, regenerative medicine, genomics and "big data") will be pivotal in improving patients' access to the most appropriate treatments.
She foresees a gradual but steady change in the way practicing physicians approach disease – a shift from treating symptoms with drugs to understanding and addressing the underlying causes of disease and degeneration; this will require physician education in new concepts, and collaboration among generalists and specialists (e.g., oncologists, immunologists).
In a nutshell, Smith makes a very convincing case that "cells are the new drugs" in the clinician's armamentarium.
Source: http://www.medpagetoday.com/columns/focusonpolicy/63562
cialis index fórum http://cialissom.com/ how long do side effects of cialis last cialis generic who has the best price on cialis cialis cheap effets indésirables cialis 20mg http://cialisles.com/ generic cialis
Sunday, May 10, 2026
Fluoxetine for Depression, Anxiety, and Related Conditions: An Overview of Clinical Uses
Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, or SSRI, and was the first member of this class to receive FDA approval in the United States in 1987. It remains among the most widely prescribed antidepressants in the world and is available under the brand name Prozac as well as numerous generic formulations. Its long half-life, broad indication profile, and well-established safety data make it a foundational agent in psychiatric and primary care prescribing. The primary mechanism of fluoxetine involves blocking the serotonin transporter protein, which reduces the reuptake of serotonin from the synaptic cleft back into the presynaptic neuron. The resulting increase in synaptic serotonin availability modulates neural circuits involved in mood regulation, anxiety, and behavioral control. FDA-approved indications for fluoxetine include major depressive disorder in adults and pediatric patients, obsessive-compulsive disorder, bulimia nervosa, panic disorder, and bipolar depression in combination with olanzapine. Off-label uses that have evidence support include premenstrual dysphoric disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and social anxiety disorder. The pediatric approval for fluoxetine in major depressive disorder and OCD distinguishes it from most other SSRIs with pediatric clinical trial data that supported this labeling. Prescribers working with younger patients often consider fluoxetine specifically because of this evidence base. Fluoxetine's exceptionally long half-life, approximately two to three days for the parent drug and up to one to two weeks for its active metabolite norfluoxetine, is a key clinical feature. This prolonged action reduces the severity of discontinuation symptoms if doses are missed and allows more flexibility in dosing schedules. Some patients are switched to fluoxetine specifically to facilitate a more gradual tapering process when stopping antidepressant therapy. Common tolerability considerations include insomnia, nausea, headache, sexual side effects, and mild activation or agitation particularly during initiation. These effects are typically manageable and often improve over the first few weeks. For patients beginning fluoxetine or wanting to understand its clinical profile better, learning about fluoxetine for depression and anxiety management provides a comprehensive overview. For patients comparing SSRIs and other antidepressant classes, the resources at antidepressant medication category guides offer valuable context for treatment discussions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.